| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| AI command injection in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. |
| The Microsoft Clarity plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.9.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the edit_clarity_project_id() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the project id and add malicious JavaScript via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| Untrusted pointer dereference in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Office Outlook allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. |
| Use after free in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Use after free in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Use after free in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Use after free in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Use after free in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Use after free in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Use after free in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Use after free in Microsoft Office Outlook allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Use after free in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Use after free in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Use after free in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exists when Microsoft Word improperly discloses the contents of its memory. An attacker who exploited the vulnerability could use the information to compromise the user’s computer or data.
To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker could craft a special document file and then convince the user to open it. An attacker must know the memory address location where the object was created.
The update addresses the vulnerability by changing the way certain Word functions handle objects in memory. |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exists when Microsoft Word improperly discloses the contents of its memory. An attacker who exploited the vulnerability could use the information to compromise the user’s computer or data.
To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker could craft a special document file and then convince the user to open it. An attacker must know the memory address location where the object was created.
The update addresses the vulnerability by changing the way certain Word functions handle objects in memory. |
| <p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Word software when it fails to properly handle objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could use a specially crafted file to perform actions in the security context of the current user. For example, the file could then take actions on behalf of the logged-on user with the same permissions as the current user.</p>
<p>To exploit the vulnerability, a user must open a specially crafted file with an affected version of Microsoft Word software. In an email attack scenario, an attacker could exploit the vulnerability by sending the specially crafted file to the user and convincing the user to open the file. In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a website (or leverage a compromised website that accepts or hosts user-provided content) that contains a specially crafted file that is designed to exploit the vulnerability. However, an attacker would have no way to force the user to visit the website. Instead, an attacker would have to convince the user to click a link, typically by way of an enticement in an email or Instant Messenger message, and then convince the user to open the specially crafted file.</p>
<p>The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Microsoft Word handles files in memory.</p> |
| <p>A security feature bypass vulnerability exists in Microsoft Word software when it fails to properly handle .LNK files. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could use a specially crafted file to perform actions in the security context of the current user. For example, the file could then take actions on behalf of the logged-on user with the same permissions as the current user.</p>
<p>To exploit the vulnerability, a user must open a specially crafted file with an affected version of Microsoft Word software. In an email attack scenario, an attacker could exploit the vulnerability by sending the specially crafted file to the user and convincing the user to open the file. In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a website (or leverage a compromised website that accepts or hosts user-provided content) that contains a specially crafted file that is designed to exploit the vulnerability. However, an attacker would have no way to force the user to visit the website. Instead, an attacker would have to convince the user to click a link, typically by way of an enticement in an email or Instant Messenger message, and then convince the user to open the specially crafted file.</p>
<p>The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Microsoft Word handles these files.</p> |
